Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 2010No. 09-35450PublishedCited by 200 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Steven Ray Bailey, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the state court’s restitution order entered after Bailey’s guilty plea to kidnapping and attempted assault. The district court denied Bailey’s habeas petition and dismissed his case concluding that Bailey did not meet the “in custody” requirement of § 2254 because he challenged only the restitution order and, alternatively, because Bailey did not exhaust his state court remedies. We have jurisdiction under 28…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by200 opinions
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Florencio Dominguez v. Scott KernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Edward RossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. HavelockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.