Legal Opinion

Garcia De Rincon v. Department of Homeland SEC.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 2008No. 04-15411PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judge:

The Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) contains a number of provisions limiting our jurisdiction to review orders that remove aliens who attempt to enter the United States unlawfully. Ranking among the most stringent is 8 U.S.C. § 1252(e). Section 1252(e) largely divests this court of jurisdiction to review the merits of an expedited removal order, which is an order that summarily removes an alien who attempts to gain entry into the United States by falsely claiming citizenship. The petitioner, Erika Garcia de Rincon (“de Rincon”), was subject to an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Todor Krumov Simeonov v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Raul Morales-Izquierdo v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Alejandro Reyes-Melendez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Lucila Avendano-Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Nelson Andrade-Garcia v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Barajas-AlvaradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Padilla-Ramirez v. BibleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam v. UsdhsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Silvia Ayala v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API