Legal Opinion

Reeb v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2011No. 09-35815PublishedCited by 218 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EZRA, District Judge:

This case requires us to decide whether a district court has subject matter jurisdiction to review the Bureau of Prisons’ (“BOP”) individualized residential drug abuse program (“RDAP”) determinations, a question of first impression in this Circuit. The existence of subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law reviewed de novo. Puri v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir.2006). Because we hold that 18 U.S.C. § 3625 precludes judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) of the BOP’s individualized RDAP determinations made pursuant to 18…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by218 opinions

  1. Esperanza Corral v. Select Portfolio ServicingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Standifer v. LedezmaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Daniel Rodriguez v. Paul CopenhaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Close v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

213 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API