Legal Opinion

Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1999No. 97-15678, 97-70384PublishedCited by 293 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

This appeal returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, 525 U.S. 471, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999) (“American-Arab ”), decided after the issuance of our prior opinion in this case. See INS v. Magana-Pizano, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 1137, 143 L.Ed.2d 206 (1999). With the guidance of AmericarkArab, we conclude that the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), Pub.L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 (Sept. 30, 1996), as amended by Act of Oct.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by293 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Anant Ram Sangeeta Ram Nazra Bibi Ram v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Abdul Hakeem v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Juan Carlos Herrera-BlancoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

288 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API