Legal Opinion
Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 25, 2001No. 00-767PublishedCited by 3,668 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
Both the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), enacted on April 24,1996, 110 Stat. 1214, and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009-546, contain comprehensive amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 66 Stat. 163, as amended, 8 U. S. C. § 1101 et seq. This case raises two important questions about the impact of those amendments. The first question is a procedural one, concerning the effect of those amendments on the availability of habeas corpus jurisdiction under…
2Cases cited104 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,668 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
3,663 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.