Earle v. Kelly
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. R. Guy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover the sum of three thousand dollars as damages alleged to have been sustained through the act of defendant in removing from the land of plaintiffs a certain building. The facts, in so far as they are necessary to be stated to illustrate the controversy, are as follows: In 1888 the grantor of plaintiffs leased certain ground, which was a lot of land situated in the city of San Diego, to one Goddard, for a term of five years. At the time this lease was made the ground was bare of any buildings or other improvements, and Goddard proceeded to place thereon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blumenberg v. MyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Wadman v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Marks v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Knox v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Rinaldi v. GollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Weisberg v. LoughridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.