Marks v. Ryan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment cf the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts not stated in the syllabus appear in the opinion of the court. .
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
By the assignment and specifications of error we are confined to the consideration of the simple question, whether the buildings, for the value of which the plaintiff recovered judgment in this action, were the personal property of the plaintiff at the time of the alleged conversion of them by the defendant.
The Pacific Glass Works, a corporation, was the owner of the premises upon which said buildings were standing, and on the 18th day of December, 1867, executed a lease of said premises to one John Anderson, for the term of one year, who before the expiration of that term erected upon said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Ness v. PacardSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Loughran v. . RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Kerr v. KingsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spencer v. Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Sanitary District v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Earle v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Wadman v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Woods v. Bank of HaywardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.