Legal Opinion

Blumenberg v. Myres

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1867PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the County Court, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff paid Booth for the premises one hundred and fifty dollars per month. The plaintiff appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.:

The plaintiff, who was the lessee of Booth for the term of five years, commencing June 1, I860, sub-let the premises to the defendant, for the term of three years from February 15, 1862, and on the 15th of April, 1864, he and the defendant executed an instrument by which it was agreed that “ said lease be prolonged up to June the first, 1865, being the full term of the lease said lessor holds from Junius Brutus Booth, for five years ending June the first, 1865." On the 23d of March, 1864, which was prior to the execution of the last mentioned instrument and before the…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Craig v. SummersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. St. Joseph & St. Louis Railroad v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Davidson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Bright v. McOuatIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Hurd v. WhitsettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API