Legal Opinion

Weisberg v. Loughridge

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1967No. Civ. 29737PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiffs, Murray and Tillie Weisberg (“Weisbergs”), appeal from a judgment declaring Walter J. Loughridge, the defendant, to be the owner of certain described property. Weisbergs filed the present action seeking declaratory relief and seeking to quiet title to the Best in the West Car Wash (“Car Wash”). After Loughridge’s demurrer was overruled, he answered, denying the allegations of the complaint, and filed a counterclaim. The case was tried without a jury and judgment ensued, declaring title to the property in Loughridge.

The dispute arose over the ownership of the Car Wash…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Christy v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. R. Barcroft & Sons Co. v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Shenson v. ShensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Christensen v. HooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
  3. Ruiz v. Gap, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
  4. Torix v. AllredIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Goldie v. Bauchet PropertiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API