Legal Opinion
Rinaldi v. Goller
California Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1957No. S. F. 19254PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in an action for declaratory relief, for overdue rent, and to quiet title.
On July 27, 1948, the plaintiffs entered into a lease of three vacant lots to the defendants Hamilton and Grays who were engaged in an automobile repair business. The lease was for a term of 10 years from that date. The lessees covenanted to pay rent at a monthly rate which was to increase in stated amounts and at specified intervals. The lease provided : “. . . if any rent shall he due and unpaid, or if default shall be made in any of the covenants herein agreed to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- California Coastal Commission v. Quanta Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Goldie v. Bauchet PropertiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Historic District Commission v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Bridges v. Cal-Pacific Leasing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Weisberg v. LoughridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.