Goudy v. Werbe
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Olds, J. —
This is an action of replevin brought by appellee Werbe against appellant and appellee Plummer. Plummer filed a disclaimer in the court below and is only a formal party.
The court made a special finding of facts, and stated conclusions of law thereon. Appellant excepted to the conclusions of law, and filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and judgment entered for appellee Werbe. The facts found by the court are as follows:
On November 27th, 1883, Henry Schnull and William A. Krag recovered three several judgments against appellee Werbe and one Ruth Domauget, before…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hixon v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Haas v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Blair v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Pond v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Crawford v. SternbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Elliott v. PontiusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Jensen v. WiersmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Purple v. FarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Fairfield Shoe Co. v. OldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.