Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Wiersma

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1919PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Sioux District Gou/rt. — W. D. Boies, Judge. Action for damages for the value of certain personal property, claimed to be exempt, which was sold by the sheriff upon execution.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

The defendant, as sheriff of Sioux Coun ty, levied an execution upon certain hay, corn, and eight pigs, alleged to he under six months of age, and sold the same to satisfy a judgment against the plaintiff and H. D. F. Leek, in favor of their landlord, for rent. Prior to the sale, each of the above-named parties separately notified the defendant in writing, under oath, that they were mam ried men, heads of families, and that they claimed that the above property was exempt from execution sale. As we understand the record, plaintiff and Leek were copartners in the leasing and operation of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. RankinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. Goudy v. WerbeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Cowan v. Their CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Drake v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. Hoyt v. HoytSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. I. Epstein & Brother v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. In Re IndvikUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1990
  3. State v. HaesemeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. ElsburyNevada Supreme Court · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API