Legal Opinion

Purple v. Farrington

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1889No. 13,008PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the DeKalb Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Berkshire, J. —

The appellees, as partners, sued the appellants, Johnson and Cannan, as partners, to recover a sum of money claimed to be due them, and averred in their complaint that the said appellants had executed to their co-appellant, Purple, a chattel mortgage upon all the partnership goods owned by them to secure an alleged indebtedness due to the mortgagee from Cannan, one of the partners, contracted long before the existence of the partnership between Cannan and Johnson; that Johnson and Cannan were insolvent when the mortgage was executed, and that the said Purple accepted the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Morris v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Kirby v. SchoonmakerNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  4. Fisher v. SyfersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Schæffer v. FithianIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reyburn v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. First National Bank v. Farmers & Merchants National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Henderson v. Indiana Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Noyes v. RossMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Simmons Hardware Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API