Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Pontius

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1893No. 15,499PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

Appellants brought suit in the court below, against appellees, to set aside a conveyance of real estate and a chattel mortgage on a stock of goods, on the ground that the deed and mortgage were fraudulent as against appellants and others, as the creditors of the appellees Rufus Pontius and James O. McElwee, partners, doing business under the firm name of Pontius & Mc-Elwee.

Trial by the court, special finding of facts, and conclusions of law thereon upon which the court rendered judgment for the appellees, defendants below.

It is assigned for error here: 1. That the court erred in overruling…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kirby v. SchoonmakerNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  2. Fisher v. SyfersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Warren v. FarmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Winslow v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Goudy v. WerbeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Boonville National Bank v. BlakeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Scott v. KellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Vandalia Coal Co. v. LawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API