Fairfield Shoe Co. v. Olds
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Huntington Circuit Court; Samuel E. Cook, Judge. Suit by the Fairfield Shoe Company and others against Ebenezer C. Olds, as assignee for the benefit of creditors of Harry J. Smith. From a decree for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
This proceeding was brought by appellants, creditors of Harry J. Smith, to prevent his assignee, Ebenezer C. Olds, from setting off to said Smith — who was when said assignment was made and when this proceeding was brought a resident householder of the State of Indiana —personal property of the value -of $600, under the provisions of §§745, 3314 Burns 1908, §§703, 2670 E. S. 1881.
A trial of said proceeding resulted in a special finding, with conclusions of law, and judgment thereon against appellants. The only error assigned calls in question the conclusions of law.
The special findings…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wright v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Charges J. Off & Co. v. MoreheadIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Cooney, Eckstein & Co. v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Sol Block & Griff v. SchwartzUtah Supreme Court · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Crawford v. SternbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Swift Co. v. . TempelosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Yancey v. Lamar-Rankin Drug Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Smith v. BoyerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Standard Forgings Co. v. HolmstromIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.