Legal Opinion

Hixon v. George

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Error from Atchison District Court. Action by Hixon and two others as partners, against George and wife, to subject certain property claimed' by defendants as a homestead, to sale upon an execution. The opinion, infra, contains a full statement of the facts and proceedings. The district court, at the' June Term 1875, gave judgment in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiffs bring the case here on error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the'court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

*255„ . , , facts. *254The facts of this case are substantially as follows: On 21st June 1869, Thomas J. George purchased in the name of his wife, Caroline George, lots 1, 2 and 3, in *255block 19, in the town of Muscotah, in Atchison county, for which he was to pay $205. One-half of the purchase-money was paid at that time, and the other half was to be paid in one year. During the summer of 1869 said Thomas J. built a dwelling-house, and made other improvements on said lots, worth, in the agrégate, about $1,200, and during the said summer he and his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Vogler v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Morris v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
  3. Gouhenant v. CockrellTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Monroe v. May, Weil & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. Shepherd v. CassidayTexas Supreme Court · 1857

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. First Nat. Bank v. GlassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  3. City of Emporia v. SodenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Wat-Tah-Noh-Zhe v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Postlethwaite v. EdsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API