Legal Opinion
Dersch v. Thomas
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided February 28, 1934No. Civ. A. No. 2227PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.
This is an appeal by defendants Commercial Discount Company, L. Clark Conner and R. S. Tatum from *788a judgment entered against them after verdict, in an action for conversion of an auto truck body.
Commercial Discount Company (herein referred to as appellant), as assignee of Conner, held a conditional sales contract on a combined auto truck and trailer (hereinafter called the truck), sold to one de la Cuesta.
The contract was in the usual form of conditional sales contracts, and provided among other things that all parts, accessories and equipment added to the truck should be-, come a part…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Bice v. Harold L. Arnold, IncorporatedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Lundy Furniture Co. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Marker v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Cosby v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. Interstate Securities Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Raddatz v. HedgpethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Sasia & Wallace, Inc. v. Scarborough Implement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Dal-Tex Tire Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962