Van Allen v. Francis
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Charles W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff sued defendants in conversion. The facts were stipulated, and judgment upon them was given for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.
Plaintiffs had entered into a contract with one William M. Langton, the essential terms of which are as follows: “Van Allen and Boughton hereby agree to sell at the sum of seventeen hundred and fifty dollars to William M. Langton” a printing *476press. “William M. Langton hereby agrees to buy said press as above specified, and to pay therefor on receipt of press cash three hundred and fifty dollars, and the balance in payments evidenced by seven notes, bearing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Williamson v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Johnson v. KaeserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Eggert v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Liver v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Thomas v. Buttress & McClellan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.