Legal Opinion

Sasia & Wallace, Inc. v. Scarborough Implement Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1957No. Civ. 9051PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Sometime prior to August, 1953, at Merced, California, defendant, Scarborough Implement Company, a copartnership (sued herein as a corporation), sold, under a conditional sales contract, six tractors, equipped as complete unit cotton pickers, with gasoline carburetion equipment, to one William Goforth. These tractors, so equipped, were taken to Kern County by Goforth. Thereafter, in August, 1953, while the tractors were in Goforth’s possession, plaintiff sold to Goforth, under a title retaining contract, six butane tanks with butane carburetion equipment, and removed the gasoline tanks and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D. Q. Service Corp. v. Securities Loan & Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. A. Meister & Sons Co. v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Dersch v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. International Atlas Services, Inc. v. Twentieth Century Aircraft Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API