Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Interstate Securities Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1940No. 34,815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

A owned a truck — or a truck chassis — which he mortgaged to B, retaining possession. The mortgage covered the truck “and all equipment and attachments thereon, substituted or added *347thereto.” Different beds were usable on the chassis. Subsequent to the mortgage, a bed specially adapted to hauling grain was built, acquired by A, attached by bolts to the chassis at different times and used by A. While the grain bed was attached to the chassis, A sold it to C, who had no actual knowledge of the mortgage. C used it at times upon another chassis…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
  3. Bousquet v. Mack Motor Truck Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Bozeman Mortuary Association v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. First National Bank v. McIntosh & Peters Live-stock & Commission Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fordyce Concrete, Inc. v. MacK Trucks, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1982
  2. Texas Hydraulic & Equipment Co. v. Associates Discount Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Gripe v. SinorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. International Harvester Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. MacK's Used Cars & Parts, Inc. v. Tennessee Truck & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API