Legal Opinion

Raddatz v. Hedgpeth

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1963No. Civ. 21047PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

Appellant Raddatz attached personal property alleged to belong to the debtor Sancal Lumber Company, a corporation, hereafter referred to as Sancal. Hedgpeth and Daniel filed a third party claim, alleging ownership of the attached property. After hearing, the trial court entered its judgment in favor of third party claimants. No findings were made by the trial court, and none were required in this proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc., § 689.) Appellant attacks the judgment, however, on the ground that the evidence does not support it. We have examined the record and have concluded that appellant is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Popper v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. George v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sequeira v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Southern California Collection Co. v. NapkieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. McKee Stair Building Co. v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. International Canning Machinery, Ltd. v. Murrieta Hot Springs (In re Murrieta Hot Springs)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API