Legal Opinion

Lundy Furniture Co. v. White

California Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1900No. S.F. No. 1855PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an action of claim and delivery. The Lundy Furniture Company, under a written contract hereinafter to he considered, delivered certain goods to Johanna White. The defendants Charles Levy and Henry Meyer claimed as purchasers from Johanna White. John Eoberts, the intervenor, claimed as assignee of a mortgage made by Johanna White to the defendants, Bier & .Eegensburger. The intervenor sought a foreclosure of his mortgage. The court rendered judgment in favor of the intervenor for the goods re-. plevied by plaintiff, or for three hundred and seventy dollars found to he the value…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Perkins v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Silverstin v. Kohler & ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Bice v. Harold L. Arnold, IncorporatedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Klein v. LeathermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API