Glick v. Marler
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs-appellants in the three consolidated cases have taken the instant appeals from the orders of the trial court which entered summary judgment on their wrongful-death claims in favor of the defendant-appellee, Norfolk & Western Railway Company (“N & W”). In challenging the decision of the trial court, the appellants argue that genuine issues of material fact exist regarding (1) the extrahazardous nature of the Cresentville Road railway crossing, (2) the failure of N & W to provide adequate warning, (3) the comparative negligence of the parties, (4) whether there existed a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Matkovich v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Zuments v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- Barger v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- William C. Hostetler v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Tardy v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Cates v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Martin v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Wagner v. GalipoOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.