Legal Opinion
Cates v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1995No. 14432PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Judge.
The appellant, Luann M. Cates, appeals from the judgment of the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court wherein the court granted summary judgment to the appellees, Consolidated Rail Corp. (“CSX”), Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, Larry Meek, and the city of Dayton.
The events surrounding the litigation occurred just before sunrise on November 7, 1991 when Cates’ husband Kenneth was en route to his place of employment. Kenneth was traveling in his automobile south on North Irwin Street in Dayton at a speed of twenty-five to thirty miles per hour. The speed limit on Irwin Street…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Franks v. LopezOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Mary Marshall, Individually and as Personal Representative v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Matkovich v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Winwood v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Joshua Nye and Judy Ramirez v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- William C. Hostetler v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Petre v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Lintner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Maret v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.