Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Galipo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1994No. 65643PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, Judge.

Defendants, Charles C. and Maryann Galipo, appeal from the judgment rendered upon a jury determination that their creation of an estate by the entireties was a fraudulent conveyance. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

The facts preceding the jury trial in this matter have been set forth as follows by the Ohio Supreme Court:

“Plaintiffs-appellees, Paul Wagner and Diane Akins, f.k.a. Diane Wagner (‘the Wagners’), obtained a judgment against defendant-appellant, Charles Galipo, for $48,000 ($24,000 for each plaintiff) in a civil action in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Murphy v. Carrollton Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Stein v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Puerto Rico Water Resources AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rieser v. Hayslip (In Re Canyon Systems Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  2. Blood v. NofzingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In Re DownsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  4. Fade v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. United States v. TolerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API