Wagner v. Galipo
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Weaver, Judge.
Defendants, Charles C. and Maryann Galipo, appeal from the judgment rendered upon a jury determination that their creation of an estate by the entireties was a fraudulent conveyance. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
The facts preceding the jury trial in this matter have been set forth as follows by the Ohio Supreme Court:
“Plaintiffs-appellees, Paul Wagner and Diane Akins, f.k.a. Diane Wagner (‘the Wagners’), obtained a judgment against defendant-appellant, Charles Galipo, for $48,000 ($24,000 for each plaintiff) in a civil action in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Murphy v. Carrollton Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Stein v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Puerto Rico Water Resources AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rieser v. Hayslip (In Re Canyon Systems Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Blood v. NofzingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re DownsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
- Fade v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- United States v. TolerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.