Legal Opinion

Barger v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1990No. 90AP-402PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCormac, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Larry Barger, appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, and raises the following assignments of error:

“I. The trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of appellee since numerous material issues existed.
“A. Summary judgment may not usurp a party’s right to trial where conflicting material facts exist.
“B. Negligence, proximate cause, discernibility, audibility of the train, unreliability of appellee’s flasher system, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Norris v. Ohio Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Joshua Nye and Judy Ramirez v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Glick v. MarlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Tardy v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Cates v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Lintner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API