William C. Hostetler v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
This is a personal injury action involving a train/car collision at a Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) grade crossing. The issue in this appeal is simply what defendant Conrad’s duty is with respect to placing extra-statutory warnings 1 such as lights and/or gates at the crossing to alert motorists to the presence of oncoming trains. Conrail argues that: (1) it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, because the evidence established that the crossing was not “extra-hazardous” and, therefore, it owed no duty to install active warnings; and (2) it was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Anthony Romano v. Kenneth Howarth, Michael Juron and Matthew KarkosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lsi Industries Inc. v. Hubbell Lighting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Alpine Industries, Inc. And William J. ConverseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Springston v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Conte v. General Housewares Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Greene v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.