Legal Opinion

William C. Hostetler v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1997No. 95-4298PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

This is a personal injury action involving a train/car collision at a Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) grade crossing. The issue in this appeal is simply what defendant Conrad’s duty is with respect to placing extra-statutory warnings 1 such as lights and/or gates at the crossing to alert motorists to the presence of oncoming trains. Conrail argues that: (1) it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, because the evidence established that the crossing was not “extra-hazardous” and, therefore, it owed no duty to install active warnings; and (2) it was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Anthony Romano v. Kenneth Howarth, Michael Juron and Matthew KarkosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lsi Industries Inc. v. Hubbell Lighting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Alpine Industries, Inc. And William J. ConverseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Springston v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Conte v. General Housewares Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Greene v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API