Legal Opinion

Edward W. Alexander Co. v. Griggs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1927No. Docket No. 67PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

The garnishee defendants seek review by writ of error of a judgment rendered against them in a suit brought by plaintiff against James A. Griggs, in which garnishee process was served upon them. They severally filed disclosures denying liability. They were examined before a circuit court commissioner, and thereafter a demand for trial of the statutory issue* was filed. It came on for hearing, and was tried before the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment for plaintiff. No request was made for findings, as required by Circuit Court Rule No. 45, nor were any filed. Defendants thereafter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Lee v. MaxwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Rice v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evangelist v. FalzeranoMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Smarr v. ColgroveMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. David v. PaulMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Evangelist v. FalzeranoMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Smarr v. ColgroveMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API