Legal Opinion

David v. Paul

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 157, Calendar No. 33,109Published

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for having, by deceit and false representations, procured from bim $500. There was judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error. Plaintiff lived in Detroit. His present wife, then unmarried, lived in the home of defendant. Plaintiff desired to marry her. Defendant represented he was sole representative of the father of the girl; that her father, who lived in Syria, Lad instructed defendant to collect $500 before bis consent be given to her marriage to plaintiff. Plaintiff introduced testimony tending to show it was agreed that after the marriage plaintiff and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Child v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Edward W. Alexander Co. v. GriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Evangelist v. FalzeranoMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Smarr v. ColgroveMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API