Lee v. Maxwell
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. Affirmed. Tire facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This is a suit upon a bond of indemnity executed by the defendants to the plaintiffs. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and the facts found by the court are as follows:
1. Lee Avas sheriff, and Yan Wagner his deputy, at the j time of the execution of the bond.
2. Defendants the MaxAvells and Prevost Avere copartners, under the name of S. A. Maxwell & Co., and defendant Sessions was surety upon the bond. .
3. April 6, 1888, James W. Tufts & Co. commenced a suit by attachment against one Willis M. Elder, a merchant, whose stock of goods consisted of groceries, crockery, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Roberts v. Stuyvesant Safe Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Davidson v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Davidson v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Root v. ChandlerNew York Supreme Court · 1833
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Koch v. PetersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Edward W. Alexander Co. v. GriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927