Legal Opinion

Rice v. City of Muskegon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1908No. Docket No. 75PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Muskegon;. Sessions, J. Assumpsit by Mary M. Rice against the city of Muskegon for taxes paid under protest. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This suit is brought to recover a personal tax paid under protest. The case was tried before the circuit judge who rendered a judgment in favor of the *680plaintiff. The case is brought here by writ of error. One of the reasons assigned in the protest why the tax was invalid reads as follows:

“Because at the time said assessment was made by the assessor of the city of Muskegon I had no personal property liable to taxation except a partnership interest in two boats owned by Parks & Rice, a copartnership, whose business was principally carried on at the time of said assessment at the city of Grand…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Woodmere Cemetery Ass'n v. Township of SpringwellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Weist v. MorlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hubbard v. GarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Peabody v. McAvoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Edward W. Alexander Co. v. GriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Federal Audit Co. v. SawyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API