Legal Opinion

Evangelist v. Falzerano

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1927No. Docket No. 31PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case was tried by the court without a jury. No findings were requested, made, or filed. We are therefore not informed as to the facts on which the trial court concluded as a matter of law that plaintiff could not recover on his claim nor defendant on his set-off. The statute and rule requiring findings of fact and conclusions of law in cases tried by the court without a jury have been of such long standing, and this court has so many times declined to decide cases on records such as the one before us, that it seems unnecessary to indulge in further discussion or statement. See Alexander…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Edward W. Alexander Co. v. GriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smarr v. ColgroveMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. David v. PaulMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Smarr v. ColgroveMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API