Vowinckel v. N. Clark & Sons
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from judgment for defendant. Action in ejectment. This action marks the culmination of a dispute of long standing over the common boundary line of adjoining properties owned by plaintiff and defendant in Alameda County.
Plaintiff, claiming a small strip of land along said boundary, sought to eject defendant therefrom and to recover damages for the alleged trespass upon and withholding thereof. Defendant answered, denying the various allegations of the complaint and alleging that in 1904 plaintiff erected a high fence to mark the true location of the common boundary; that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Staniford v. TromblyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Silva v. AzevedoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Lewis v. OgramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Martin v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Roberts v. BraeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Park v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.