Roberts v. Brae
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
In this action to quiet title the plaintiff appeals from a judgment granting such relief to the defendants in conformity with the allegations and prayer of their respective cross-complaints.
Plaintiff claims to be the record owner of lots 4 and 5 in block 9 of the town site of Diamond Springs, El Dorado County. The defendants are adjoining owners, being, respectively, the record owners of lots 3 and 6. In other words, the defendant Scheiber owns a lot that adjoins plaintiff’s lot 4, and the defendant Brae owns a lot adjoining plaintiff’s lot 5. This action is the result of a dispute over the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Muchenberger v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Staniford v. TromblyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Moniz v. PetermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Vowinckel v. N. Clark & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Brown v. MillinerUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hartzell v. MyallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.