Legal Opinion

Park v. Powers

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1935No. Sac. 4869PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

From a judgment quieting plaintiffs’ title to lands in El Dorado County, defendants Sabra E. Powers and Katherine S. Hill prosecute separate appeals. Said land is situate on the shore of Lake Tahoe, and is a portion of lot 2, in the northwest quarter of section 27, township 13 north, range 18 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian. It comprises approximately the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section 27. Said northwest quarter of section 27 has no southwest or northwest quarter, but the southeast quarter thereof, that is, lot 2, is bounded by Lake Tahoe. The present'…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. First National Bank v. EastmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. McDonald v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. Eden Place v. Sholem PerlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Da Shores v. Dl LindseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API