Clapp v. Churchill
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. ■
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought to determine the common boundary line between plaintiffs’ land upon the north and defendants ’ land upon the south, and to restrain defendants from cutting down and destroying a row of pomegranate trees which plaintiffs assert are upon and define the boundary line. A nonsuit was granted and from the judgment which followed plaintiffs appeal.
The land in controversy is a strip four or five feet wide and 590 feet long. There is no contention that there are any false calls in the deed to the plaintiffs nor that there is any discrepancy between the calls and visible and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Lewis v. OgramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Loustalot v. McKeelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Mann v. MannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by44 opinions
- Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Martin v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Roberts v. BraeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.