Legal Opinion

Silva v. Azevedo

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1918No. Sac. No. 2569. Department OnePublishedCited by 29 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. S. Luke Howe, and Downey, Pullen & Downey, for Appellants. Driver & Driver, B. F. Van Dyke, and Frank Tade, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Ejectment to recover a strip of land containing about six and one-half acres. Judgment went for plaintiffs, and the defendants appeal.

The plaintiffs are the successors in interest of Manuel Silva. The defendants are husband and wife. For purposes of statement and discussion, we may treat the case as if Manuel Silva were the plaintiff and Joseph V. Azevedo the sole defendant.

In 1908, Azevedo purchased a tract of farming land, containing something.over 126 acres, in Sacramento. The parcel was quadrilateral, its easterly and westerly lines being parallel, the southerly line meeting these at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Price v. De ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lewis v. OgramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Martin v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Muchenberger v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Park v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API