Calimpco, Inc. v. Warden
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
In an action to recover the statutory penalty for usury, tried without a jury, plaintiffs recovered judgment in specific amounts against each defendant, excepting defendants Luther Warda, Louis Mazzera, doing business as G. Mazzera Building Materials Company and Arco Building Company. Judgment for costs against plaintiffs was given in favor of these last mentioned defendants. Plaintiffs appealed from the judgment in favor of said defendants, and also from that portion of the judgment denying plaintiffs, as against all the other defendants, the amounts sued for in excess of the amounts…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Maxwell Hardware Co. v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Nelson v. Fernando Nelson & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Boerner v. Colwell Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Fazzi v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Freedman v. HendershottIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
- DCM PARTNERS v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.