Legal Opinion

Maxwell Hardware Co. v. Foster

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 12783PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action for the foreclosure of a materialman’s lien for building materials furnished defendant Foster in the construction of a building upon real property belonging to the defendant Kates. The court gave judgment in favor of defendant Kates. The plaintiff has appealed. The evidence fails to show that Poster had any authority from Kates to purchase said materials, or to construct said building, or that Kates had any knowledge that the building was being constructed. Without evidence showing that defendant Kates had knowledge of the construction of said building, the real property owned by him…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FunkensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. United Railroads of S.F. v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Leaf v. Phil Rauch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Cook v. Stewart McKee & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Schmidt v. MacCo Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Cooper v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API