McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Plaintiffs filed a class action against defendant brokerage firm. They alleged, first, that defendant unlawfully charged compound interest on the debit balance in margin accounts without a clear written agreement authorizing the compounding of interest as required by section 2 of the Usury Law. Finding that defendant’s customer’s agreement complied with the requirements of section 2, the trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to this charge without leave to amend.
*369Plaintiffs further alleged that defendant charged excessive interest. The complaint specifies that defendant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Richard Kline v. Coldwell, Banker & Co., RealtorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- O'Brien v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- American Timber & Trading Co. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- American Timber & Trading Co. v. First National Bank Of OregonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Handi Investment Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.