Legal Opinion
Ahuja v. Detica Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2010No. Civil Action 09-2246 (CKK)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Kalpana Ahuja, brings this action against her former employer, Detica, Incorporated (“Defendant”). Plaintiff alleges that Defendant discriminated against her on the basis of her gender, race, and national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., on the basis of her race in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“ § 1981”), and the basis of her age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Presently before the Court are…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Vasser v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Bowe-Connor v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Latson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Aldrich v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Percy v. New York (Hudson Valley DDSO)District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.