Legal Opinion
Vasser v. Shinseki
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 29, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-0185PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting Dependant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Vivian Vasser alleges that she was unlawfully discriminated and retaliated against when the Department of Veterans Affairs failed to promote her ten different times over the course of three years. Although the details of each alleged failure-to-promote are unique, Defendant’s motion hinges on just one attribute of Ms. Vas-ser’s claims: their timing. Defendant argues that Ms. Vasser did not administratively exhaust her claims because she failed to raise some of them to…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Green v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Nat'l Ass'n v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Deppner v. Spectrum Health Care Res., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Pinson v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Moore v. U.S. Dep't of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Tyson v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.