Legal Opinion

Tice v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 16, 1977PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

The defendant appeals from a conviction of assault with intent to murder. 1 He admits shooting the victim but claims that he acted in self defense. He contends that the Trial Court erred in the following respects: in instructing the jury on flight after the crime; in not instructing on both the pre- and post-1973 Criminal Code provisions on self defense; in excluding evidence of a previous assault conviction of the victim; and in denying a motion for acquittal. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

The incident occurred five days after the victim had married the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Towle v. AubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Farrar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. State v. BiterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
  4. Quillen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  5. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API