Tice v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Chief Justice:
The defendant appeals from a conviction of assault with intent to murder. 1 He admits shooting the victim but claims that he acted in self defense. He contends that the Trial Court erred in the following respects: in instructing the jury on flight after the crime; in not instructing on both the pre- and post-1973 Criminal Code provisions on self defense; in excluding evidence of a previous assault conviction of the victim; and in denying a motion for acquittal. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
The incident occurred five days after the victim had married the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Towle v. AubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Farrar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- State v. BiterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
- Quillen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.