Legal Opinion

Coleman v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 19, 1974PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

(for the majority of the Court)

The defendant seeks review of his conviction for assault and battery on the ground that the Trial Court improperly charged the jury as to the defense of justification. The instruction included the following :

“ * * *. The use of force upon or towards another is justifiable when the defendant reasonably believes that such force is admittedly necessary for the purpose of protecting himself against the use of unlawful force by the other person at the time.
“ * * * [Wjhere one is assaulted in a sudden affray, and in the judgment of the jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. RobinsonDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1944
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. William C. Wardlaw v. William R. Pickett, Deputy United States MarshalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  2. State v. GelinasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Lloyd v. JeffersonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  4. Tice v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  5. Moor v. LicciardelloSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API