Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 16, 1983PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORSEY, Justice:

These criminal appeals raise constitutional questions concerning the sufficiency of arrest warrants, standing to challenge search warrants and double jeopardy in sentencing. Defendants Andrew Thomas and Bernard Johnson were jointly tried and found guilty in two separate trials by jury in Superior Court of two robberies that occurred on the same day in Wilmington, Delaware. 1

Defendants Thomas and Johnson were first tried in March, 1981 on charges of committing an armed robbery in mid-afternoon on October 24, 1980 of a Wilmington loan company office. In the course of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API