Legal Opinion

State v. Biter

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 28, 1955No. 14 and 15PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, J.:

Three reasons are set forth in support of granting one or both motions. The first is that the verdict was the result of pre judice. The second that, since the evidence was entirely circumstantial, and as consistent with defendant’s innocence as guilt, the motion for acquittal must be granted. And, finally, the important assignment of error is that there was not sufficient evidence to support a conviction.

As to the first reason, it must be conceded that a great deal of notoriety was attached to the case. However, if defendants thought their positions were prejudiced thereby, they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CasaleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  2. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. United States v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. State v. ColeNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1921
  5. State v. ThomasNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. McBride v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. State v. DeatonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. PritchettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Hutchins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
  5. Banther v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API