Legal Opinion

Fullard v. Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1972No. Appeal, No. 198PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Packel, J.,

The plaintiff-appellant lost sight in one eye as a result of it being penetrated by a piece of steel, flying *186off an allegedly defective chisel. He had admitted in the course of his testimony that the chisel, supplied him by an employee of one of the defendants, appeared to be rusty and ragged and that flakes came off as he was striking the chisel to put a hole in . a steel barrel. The barrel and the chisel had been supplied by an employee of the defendant-housing authority to enable the plaintiff’s employer, an additional defendant, to perform his contract with the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Simonton v. MortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Celender v. Allegheny County Sanitary AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Giannone v. RealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Moseley v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Shuman Estate v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Lockett v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. McKENNA v. Art Pearl Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Lambert v. Pittsburgh Bridge & Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API