Legal Opinion

McKENNA v. Art Pearl Works, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1973No. Appeal, 613PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellants contend that the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment on the amended complaint.

The instant suit arose out of an accident occurring on December 10, 1969, in which the wife-appellant sustained injuries while operating a punch press in the course of her employment at the Adelphia Button Company. The punch press had been purchased from the Art Pearl Works, Inc., through its authorized agent Bernard Dorfmann. Appellants filed their Complaints in Trespass and Assumpsit against the appellees, Art Pearl Works, Inc., and Bernard Dorfmann…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Homestead Borough v. Defense Plant Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Levin v. Pittsburgh United Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Price Bar, Inc. Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Moises Galindo v. Precision American Corp., Georgia Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Wicks v. Milzoco Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Francioni v. Gibsonia Truck Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Irving B. Gruber v. Owens-Illinois Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API