Legal Opinion

Moseley v. Reading Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1929No. Appeal, 106PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

On January 15, 1927, the plaintiff, DeWitt Moseley, an employee of the Reading Company, defendant, was injured by the explosion of a can of oil. This suit, brought on account of damages thereby sustained, resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant has appealed.

None of the alleged errors calls for a reversal. Snow had fallen on the day of the accident and it was the duty of plaintiff and another employee, named Burke, to clean the frogs of the switches at Logan Station, north of Philadelphia. This was done by pouring on oil, which, being set…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Connecticut River Paper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Kanawha & Michigan Railway Co. v. KerseSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Davis v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Reese v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Albert v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bentivoglio v. RalstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Paul v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Green v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Merling v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Haas v. KasnotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API