Legal Opinion

Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 2001PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTodd, J.

¶ 1 In this action, James T. Drum (“Drum”) and Linda I. Drum appeal the judgment entered on a molded verdict against them and in favor of Appellees Shaull Equipment and Supply Company (“Shaull”), Larry Brown and Marlin Pentz in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. 1 This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania for reconsideration in light of the standard for review of the denial of a motion for a new trial recently enunciated by our Supreme Court in Harman v. Borah, 562 Pa. 455, 756 A.2d 1116 (2000). 2 Upon review under Harman, we vacate the judgment in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. JulianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Collins v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Henery v. ShadleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Prime Medica Associates v. Valley Forge Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Sovereign Bank v. ValentinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES, LOCAL UNION NO. 3. v. Mid-Atlantic Promotions, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API